Wake Forest Coins
email:george@wakeforestcoins.com
Slave Hire Badges
Charleston, South Carolina
|

|
| 1852 SERVANT dug tag, rough. Late tag, 40 mm, clear punches,
retoning over harsh cleaning. Tag looks darker and much nicer than the scan.
Cheap at.....$750.00 |
|

|
| 1836 SERVANT dug, rough, cheap. Large tag, 53 mm, retoning.
Charleston clearer than the scan, date looks about right, number 826 bold. An
early large tag for......$950.00 |
|

|
| 1834 SERVANT dug tag, porous but pleasant light brown patina.
Original concave shape, 52 mm, no damage. Very nice early tag......$3,200.00 |
|

|
| 1831 SERVANT dug tag, very sharp punches. Slightly porous, 53
mm, retoning. Original concave shape, small old scratch above 1732, doesn't show in
scan. Excellent early large tag.......$3,850.00 |
|
The tags below are all sold. I keep them on the site for customer reference.
Scroll down for general information on slave tags and a link to purchase:
Slave Badges and the Slave-Hire System in Charleston, South Carolina,
1783-1865
by Harlan Greene, Harry S., Jr. Hutchins, Brian E. Hutchins
Great reference. |
|
 |
(BAS1) 1816 Servant Slave Tag A very nice early style tag on a
large (50mm) square planchet with a Lafar (the silversmith who made the tag)
counterstamp on the back. Square tag, with top hole centered on top edge, four line
bar-punch legend: *Charleston*, with initial * missing due to weak
strike. Some of the Charleston letter tops are weak, but overall quite
legible. 1816 below, third line Servant, last: No
284. Each of the four edges was to reduce the discomfort of the sharp edges
digging into the wearer. The tag has obviously been excavated and has a very
pleasant light green patina with some minor unevenness. Overall, bowed out slightly,
convex, as issued. The old style lettering is pleasing and desirable. A
visually striking tag and quite readable at a distance. Overall a very nice early
tag. Clearly the best eye appeal tag of the group offered. About very fine
or better and about as nice as they come for an early excavated tag........sold |
|

|
(BAS2) 1845 Mechanic Slave Tag A scarce occupation with
Servant and Porter being the most common. A diamond shaped
tag with bar-punched lines. Charleston curved, some letters weak,
1845 with the 4 weak due to a fold in the metal, now unfolded,
Mechanic with the center letters weak due to the fold. Below, an incuse
bar punch 239 serial number, bold. On a 44mm thin copper planchet, holed
for wearing at top, edges clipped, slightly convex. Excavated, darkish brown.
About very good to fine. A scarce occupation, and a reasonable example of an
excavated tag........sold |
|

|
|
|
|
| (BAS3) 1849 Porter Slave Tag Somewhat
scarcer than Servant, this is another diamond shaped tag. Four
lines, bar punches: Charleston curved, just a bit weak, with 1849
below, bottom portion a little weak. Porter below, very weak.
Serial number 105 below, bold. On a 40mm copper planchet, holed at top,
edges clipped, with significant overall pitting from being in the ground. About
very good to fine. Nice light brown, convex as made.......sold
|
|
|

|
(BAS4) 1850 Servant Slave Tag While all the above
tags have the serial number last, this and the next tag have the number after
Charleston. A diamond shaped tag with four lines. Charleston
curved, end letters bold, center letters weak. 1266" serial number
incuse, very strong and bold. Below, Servant in bar-punch, clear and
strong. 1850 below, strong. A 39mm square copper planchet, top
hole, edges clipped, convex, as made. Glossy darker brown, but quite clear and quite
visible except for the center letters of Charleston. About
very fine to extremely fine. A choice tag and very legible from a distance.......sold |
|

|
(BAS5) 1861 Servant Slave Tag A scarce Civil War
dated tag, also diamond shaped, with four lines. Charleston curved,
bar-punched, center bold. 2022 serial number, incuse, very bold.
Servant below, just a little weak, 1861 date below. Copper
tag, 41mm square, top hole, edges clipped, convex. Some light pitting from being
in the ground and some roughness of the edges. About fine to very fine. Light
brown, nice legible slave tag from the Civil War years.....sold |
|

|
(BAS6) 1833 Porter Slave Tag Scarcer than
Servant tags, this diamond shaped badge has four lines, bar punches:
Charleston curved, serial number 583 , above
Porter, date at bottom "1833", all bold. On a large 50mm
copper planchet, holed at top, edges clipped, with localized pitting from being in the
ground. Found with a metal detector near King's Bay, Georgia. How it
got there, I haven't a clue. I bought it from the guy who dug it. About
very fine. Nice color (darker brown than the picture), convex as made.............sold |
|

|
(BAS7) 1828 Porter Slave Tag A very nice early
style tag on a large (50mm) square planchet with a Lafar (the silversmith who
made the tag) counterstamp on the back. Square tag, with top hole centered on
top edge, four line bar-punch legend: *Charleston*, with final *
missing due to weak strike. 1828 below, third line
Porter, last: No 254 bold. Latest date LAFAR tag I know. Dug
and cleaned. Darker than scan but shows copper color. Very attractive tag............sold |
|

|
| (BAS8) 1860 Servant Slave Tag A very
nice dug tag on a small (36mm) square planchet. Late dated tag, first 1860 tag I've
seen. Good color, medium brown and free from damage. Although excavated and
showing some porosity, very pleasant surfaces. Lettering a little weak but number
punches are strong. Can you hear the drums of civil war from Charleston through this
tag? The election of Abraham Lincoln as president in November 1860 precipitated the
secession of South Carolina on December 20th 1860 and the attack on Fort Sumpter in the
Charleston harbor on April 10th 1861. Darker than scan and available for
immediate sale at................price reduced.......sold....$2,395.00 |
|

|
| (BAS9) 1825 Servant Slave Tag A high
grade tag on a large (50mm) square planchet. Last year of the Lafar stamp.
Good color, medium brown with reddish tints in the protected areas from mud stains.
Free from damage. Very pleasant surfaces and very strong lettering. I bought
this tag from a young man who found it on the bottom of the Cooper River a few miles north
of Charleston. He was scuba diving in about 50 feet of water and was looking for
ancient shark teeth when he spotted this tag last summer. He wrote out his story to
go with the tag. Excellent condition and superb eye appeal. Just about
the nicest looking tag I've ever seen. Good scan but tag looks nicer.....available
for immediate sale at........sold |
|
|
|
| Human
slavery is an unfortunate and regrettable part of American history. Slavery and
slave hire were also common historical practices worldwide and date back to ancient
times. A review of western civilization reveals that the ancient Egyptians, Greeks,
and Romans would not have been successful without the institution of slavery. The
early Arabic countries also had very sophisticated slavery practices. The ancient
and Arabic world saw the bondage of very skilled laborers such as physicians, accountants,
lawyers, and merchants. Most Americans are familiar with what
human chattel slavery must have been like in its southern agricultural setting. Many
have read Uncle Tom's Cabin, seen television mini-series ("Roots" for example), watched
"Gone with the Wind," visited antebellum historical sites or plantations, or in
other ways been exposed to various aspects of plantation slavery. However, few
Americans know much about the institutionalization of slavery in the some of the major
southern cities.
In the urban south,
slaves were a pool of skilled and semi-skilled labor. Many slaves had learned
marketable trades or had become adept at in-house roles such as personal
service. A slave's value to his or her owner lay in the work the slave
performed. If a slave had a skill that could be marketed outside the owner's home,
then the slave's labor could be sold and the wages received would accrue directly to
the owner. Receipts for plantation slave hires are relatively common today.
Several southern cities
accommodated slave owners by developing a system to hire out their slaves. In early
colonial times hiring slaves was an ad hoc affair, a private arrangement between the owner
and the recipient of the labor. By the second decade of the 18th century, slavery for hire became
regulated by local government. While Savannah, Mobile, New Orleans, Norfolk,
and Charleston regulated the practice through the passage of "badge
laws," only Charleston and Charleston Neck, a small suburb of Charleston, actually
issued slave hire badges. The badge allowed short term employment without written
contracts or other documentation. Moreover, hired slaves, by wearing a badge, could
be easily distinguished from runaways or free blacks.
The cities instituted
badge laws to provide a tax income and to regulate the slave hiring. White artisans
complained as early as 1742 about slaves undercutting their prices. This was
perceived as an ongoing problem, especially in the fishing industry and the selling of
fresh produce. While rural blacks retained much of their homeland culture, due to
the remoteness and lack of interaction with others, slavery was much different in the
larger port cities. Slaves often lived apart from their owners and had a great
deal of autonomy. Slaves also had contact with freed slaves, free blacks, non-white
slave owners, and shop keepers who catered to black clientele. Many ministers
established churches for black people. This interaction tended to undermine the
control over slaves. Consequently, slave control became the responsibility of local
government
Beginning in 1712
legislative acts were passed in Charleston to limit self-hire and to require written
contracts. Over the years several laws were passed with some degree of
success. In 1751 slave artisans were ordered to wear badges identifying their trade
and in 1783 the city of Charleston extended the requirement to slave vendors of
fruits and vegetables as well as fishermen.
While early legislation
specified slaves were to wear paper tickets or badges, none have survived dated prior to
1800. After several versions, repealed acts, and new badge ordinances, badges were abolished by
1790. No genuine pre-1800 dated tags are known to exist.
Hire badges were
re-established in 1800 by a rather stiff ordinance in Charleston, partly to appease
white merchants but more importantly to curb the increasing autonomy of the urban slave. An
ordinance in 1789 barred slaves and free blacks from selling certain "goods, wares
and merchandise"
without a license. In 1796 it became unlawful for slaves to carry on a trade
for themselves or to teach a trade to other slaves. Owners of slave craftsmen
had to keep one white apprentice for every four slaves employed. Slave vendors were
perceived to be gaining control of Charleston's internal economy. In 1848, for the
first time, slaves could work for other slaves or free blacks.
The 1800 ordinance
issued a fee schedule by occupation, aiming to reduce the number of slaves involved in
slave hire. It prohibited owners who were not city residents from hiring out their
slaves, and limited the number of slave hires to six per resident. Slave hire
ordinance also required the Charleston city marshals to construct and maintain stands for
hiring porters and other day laborers, and to set allowable working hours and wage
schedules. The annual fee was $1 for servants and $2 for porters, increasing in 1843
to $2 for servants and up to $7 for other skills. The slave population in
Charleston was 15,354 in 1830, falling away to 14,673 in 1840.
Records of badge license
fees collected in Charleston reveal the popularity of slave hire, as $14,000 in badge fees
were collected in 1848, $26,000 in 1859. A good estimate is that 12-30% of
Charleston's slaves wore badges in the 1820s through the 1840s. 40% to 50% of the
Charleston slaves had badges after 1840. Badges were issued in Charleston Neck
during 1849 and 1850.
A slave for hire was
required by law to renew his license each year and receive a new badge with a new license
number. In some cases it appears that the previous year's badge may have been
reissued, the old license number and the date effaced and the new information punched into
what had
been the blank reverse of the badge. This expediency is known from badges dated 1862
and 1863
and probably reflects the strained circumstance in Charleston under the Union siege.
Slave ordinances governed the slave hire system and other aspects of the
"peculiar institution" in Charleston until the Union siege began to break down
the city's social structure. The last known dated tag is 1864.
Slave hire badges were
made from thin copper sheet cut to size and shape. Most were square, about
40mm on each side. In general, early badges (issued before 1820) are larger.
The Ford Collection 1817 Fruiterer's badge measures 51.9mm by 50.2mm. The 1816 tag
offered below is about 50mm square. A unique round servant's badge is dated
1802. The upper corners of the rectangular Ford Collection 1811 servant's badge are
scalloped and the suspension hole is in the center of the top edge, a very unusual design.
Early badges were issued
in lesser numbers and may have been 'custom made". Later badges were issued
annually in larger numbers and have a "mass produced" look to them. Most
square-shaped badges were trimmed to eliminate the sharp corner points. Since the
badge laws required the badge to be worn in open view, all tags bear a hole for
the suspension cord in one corner. When worn, the badge hung with one point down, in
the shape of a diamond, and the badge's inscription was to be legible horizontally across
its face.
Early tags were usually
countermarked with a punch by the issuing silversmith, such as the Lafar 1816 tag
offered below. In 1800 Ralph Atmar Jr. marked tags "ATMAR." From
1801 to about 1810, tags were marked "C PRINCE." John J. Lafar
marked them with his punch "LAFAR" from 1811 to 1828. Lafar lived from
1781 to 1849, and was a well known Charleston silversmith and city marshall. Tags
are not known to have been hallmarked by the manufacturer after 1828. In accordance
with the badge ordinances of 1800 and 1806 almost all tags are also stamped with the city,
the date, a serial number and the occupation, such as servant or porter, the two
most common. The 1812 Servant's badge in the Bowers and Merena 1990 sale had a hand
engraved license number.
The
"commonest" occupation found on Charleston slave hire badges is that of
servant. An estimated three out of every five surviving badges were issued to
servants. Porter badges follow next in rarity, roughly one in five.
These were the semi-skilled trades. About one in ten known were issued to
mechanics. The rarest occupations found on slave hire badges are those of fruiterer,
carpenter, and fisherman. Slave hire badges were also worn by chimney sweeps, bread carters, and dog
handlers. Badges for the latter three occupations are not known to have survived.
Slave badges
remain the only slave item that can be positively guaranteed to have been made for and
worn by a slave. With the added guarantee of an exact date and occupation, it is no
wonder the tags are extremely popular with medal, black history, and other collectors.
A word on fakes and
fantasy slave tags is in order. There are NO known genuine slave tags from anywhere
except Charleston and Charleston Neck. All such tags seen to date are fantasy/fake
pieces. All fully hand engraved tags are fakes. There are some fake tags that
are highly deceptive, struck from dies in close imitation to these shown here. I
have seen some on eBay. Be sure to get a written bill of sale and guarantee of
authenticity when buying any slave tag. All tags offered by Wake Forest Coins come
with a full lifetime guarantee and are unconditionally guaranteed to be genuine pieces,
without exception.
The American Numismatic
Association no longer issues photographic certificates for authenticated items. The ANA is a
federally chartered non-profit organization for coin, token and medal collectors. Please write
them and request they answer to the needs of the hobby and authenticate tags and other
collectibles as they have done in the past. Also, the ANA should take a leading role
in the removal of the the copies and junk from eBay and other internet venues. Not only tags but all spurious numismatic items as well.
Overall the ANA is an excellent organization. I am a member. Their web
address......http://www.money.org/index.shtml
There is an excellent new
book on the subject of slave hire badges.
Absolutely necessary reference.

Click here to
buy this book from amazon.com
Slave Badges and the Slave-Hire
System in Charleston, South Carolina,
1783-1865
by Harlan Greene, Harry S., Jr. Hutchins, Brian E. Hutchins
Quoting from the amazon.com book review:
Book Description
The slave-hire system of Charleston, South Carolina, in the 1700s and the 1800s produced a
curious objectthe slave badge. The badges were intended to legislate the practice of
hiring a slave from one master to another, and slaves were required by law to wear them.
Slave badges have become quite collectible and have excited both scholarly and popular
interest in recent years.
This work documents how the slave-hire system in Charleston came about, how it worked,
who was in charge of it, and who enforced the laws regarding slave badges. Numerous badge
makers are identified, and photographs of badges, with commentary on what the data stamped
on them mean, are included. The authors located income and expense statements for
Charleston from 1783 to 1865, and deduced how many slaves were hired out in the city every
year from 1800 on. The work also discusses forgeries of slave badges, now quite common.
About the Author
Harlan Greene is head of Special Collections at Charleston County Public Library. Harry
S. Hutchins, Jr., is an associate professor at the Medical University of South
Carolina in Charleston. Brian E. Hutchins lives in San Jose, California.
|
|